anacel 的碎碎念

上星期花了4個晚上做的功課(另加半個星期六下午)
按下submit鍵的時候,我完全感到什麼是burnt out, 結果這個星期完全的頹廢狀態(上網,打私服WOW,玩謎game…)[我不能長時間做正經事]

功課發回來了,comment是
This was a very concise, well-articulated paper [啥鬼,老子沒時間,腦袋空空根本填不滿2千字]. that showed evidence of wide-reading[當中的reference,根本是人云亦云,我很多根本都沒看過就是].

It was well-argued and supported with appropriate references and referencing. Your section on the Definition of Trust was particularly good and after canvassing the various definitions, [剛好google到有個好source,差不多只是整段paraphase一次...]

I like the way you summarised the notion of trust[不summarize我字數不夠]. This provided a solid framework[solid 不solid我根本沒想過...] for the rest of your discussion and you did not lose focus.

The rest of your paper was smooth flowing and showed clear focus on the tutorial question[我只是跟question的建議方向跑一次...]. Your conclusion was good and highlighted an interesting question – is trust merely a helper that facilitates a knowledge community or is it an actual driver? You also raised another interesting element, which added depth to your paper – conversations – what is the role of conversations/dialogue in building trust within a knowledge community. [我整篇文一次都沒提過converstion,你倒是看的出來,算你狠] Slight error in referencing/citation. Well done.

16/20 [鳴啊,好高分,外國人評卷真的是寬宏一點]

吐槽完畢